Ver el código de «Diseño de agentes virtuales accesibles desde procesos participativos con adultos autistas»

{{Proyecto de Investigación
|Título=Codiseño de agentes virtuales para adultos autistas en el entorno doméstico
|Palabras Clave=autismo, interacción humano-computadora, agente virtual, tecnologías asistivas, codiseño.
|Carreras Relacionadas=Magíster
|Año de Inicio=2024
|Año de Término=2025
|Fuente de Financiamiento=FONDEF
|Área de Investigación=Forma, Cultura y Tecnología
|Modalidad de Investigación=Asociado (interuniversitario)
|Investigador Responsable=Daniel Serrano
|Coinvestigadores=Herbert Spencer, Katherine Exss, Vanessa Vega Córdova
}}
=Presentación del proyecto=
{{#widget:Vimeo|id=1091659661}}
=Resumen=
La condición del espectro autista (CEA) es un conjunto de afecciones en el desarrollo del cerebro que afecta principalmente las habilidades sociales del individuo y la manifestación de comportamientos repetitivos y estereotipados, entre otros rasgos conductuales (WHO, 2023). A nivel doméstico, estos rasgos pueden llevar al desarrollo de escenarios como rutinas estructuradas, rígidas e inalterables, falta de cuidado personal y olvido de tareas aperiódicas, lo que impacta en la autonomía y calidad de vida de las personas que lo padecen, contribuyendo a relaciones de dependencia y discapacidad. En este contexto se plantea el proyecto FONDEF TEAsy Life, al cual se adscribe esta investigación. Éste plantea el desarrollo de un dispositivo inteligente que utilice un agente virtual de inteligencia artificial (IA), para asistir a adultos autistas de nivel 1 y 2 en el desarrollo de las actividades de la vida diaria en el entorno doméstico.

Los sistemas de inteligencia artificial avanzada lanzados al mercado en los últimos años abren la posibilidad de diseñar herramientas que se adapten al usuario, aprendan y actualicen constantemente, proporcionando un apoyo personalizado y contextualizado. Sin embargo, junto a las posibilidades que brinda la IA, surgen nuevas interrogantes sobre el funcionamiento de esta tecnología y su impacto en el usuario. Algunas de estas incluyen el manejo seguro de la información personal y los efectos psicológicos que puede tener en estos la interacción con sistemas como Chat GPT-4 que pasó el test de Turing en 2024 (Jones & Bergen, 2024).

Si a esta funcionalidad se le suma una marcada preferencia de las personas autistas por interactuar con estímulos antropomórficos por sobre humanos reales (Atherton & Cross, 2018), y su mayor propensión a la antropomorfización de objetos (Clutterbuck et al., 2022), esta investigación se pregunta si la percepción de este sistema como agente social (Balasuriya et al., 2024) afectaría su accesibilidad y la percepción de autonomía del usuario en relación a la herramienta.

Para responder a esta interrogante se plantea realizar una investigación participativa mediante talleres de codiseño con adultos autistas de nivel 1 y 2, para desarrollar un modelo de diseño de dispositivo inteligente que sea atingente a los anhelos y necesidades reales de adultos autistas, dando como resultado una herramienta que promueva la autonomía, sea accesible y de valor para su vida doméstica cotidiana.

=Referencias=
{| class="wikitable" style="background: #F6F6F6; border: dotted #000 1px; padding: 100px;"
|-
|
*Alač, M. (2016). Social robots: Things or agents? AI & SOCIETY, 31(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6

*Álvarez-Aguado, I., Delgado, P. C., Carrasco, F. G., Cid, K. E., Azagra, M. J., González, H. S., & Córdova, V. V. (2021). Expertos por Experiencia. El proceso de investigación inclusiva: Un desafío para los nuevos tiempo (1st ed.). Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso PUCV. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv261rc3b

*Alzahrani, M., Uitdenbogerd, A. L., & Spichkova, M. (2021). Human-Computer Interaction: Influences on Autistic Users. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4691–4700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.247

*APA, A. P. (2014). MANUAL DIAGNÓSTICO Y ESTADÍSTICO DE LOS TRASTORNOS MENTALES DSM-5 (5th ed.). Editorial Médica Panamericana.

*Arendt, H. (1958). La condición humana. Paidós.

*Aslam, S., Dijk, J. V., & Dertien, E. (2019). CoCoCo: Co-Designing a Co-design toolkit for Co-bots to empower autistic adults. 539102 Bytes. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7855904.V1

*Atherton, G., & Cross, L. (2018). Seeing More Than Human: Autism and Anthropomorphic Theory of Mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00528

*Baker, E., Stavropoulos, K. K. M., Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2021). Daily living skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Implications for intervention and independence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 83, 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101761

*Balasuriya, S. S., Sitbon, L., & Mitchel, A. (2024). Attributes of robots co-designed with people with intellectual disabilities to support them in diverse contexts.

*Baron‐Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: The Empathizing–Systemizing (E‐S) Theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x

*Barry, M., & Doherty, G. (2017). How We Talk About Interactivity: Modes and Meanings in HCI Research. Interacting with Computers, 29(5), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx004

*Black, M. H., Clarke, P. J. F., Deane, E., Smith, D., Wiltshire, G., Yates, E., Lawson, W. B., & Chen, N. T. M. (2023). “That impending dread sort of feeling”: Experiences of social interaction from the perspectives of autistic adults. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 101, 102090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.102090

*Brighenti, S., Cena, F., & Keller, R. (2025). Personalized interactive urban maps for autism: An innovative approach involving persons with Level 1 autism spectrum disorder to user-centered design. Advances in Autism, 11(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-09-2023-0059

*Cabibihan, J.-J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why Robots? A Survey on the Roles and Benefits of Social Robots in the Therapy of Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2

*Cascio, M. A., Grond, F., Motta-Ochoa, R., Tembeck, T., Veen, D. T., & Blain-Moraes, S. (2020). Working Together: Ethnographic Observations on Participatory Design Involving Adults with Autism. Human Organization, 79(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259.79.1.1

*Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007

*Choi, D., Lee, S., Kim, S.-I., Lee, K., Yoo, H. J., Lee, S., & Hong, H. (2024). Unlock Life with a Chat(GPT): Integrating Conversational AI with Large Language Models into Everyday Lives of Autistic Individuals. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641989

*Clutterbuck, R. A., Shah, P., Leung, H. S., Callan, M. J., Gjersoe, N., & Livingston, L. A. (2022). Anthropomorphic tendencies in autism: A conceptual replication and extension of White and Remington (2019) and preliminary development of a novel anthropomorphism measure. Autism, 26(4), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211039387

*David, D. O., Costescu, C. A., Matu, S., Szentagotai, A., & Dobrean, A. (2020). Effects of a Robot-Enhanced Intervention for Children With ASD on Teaching Turn-Taking Skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830344

*Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (2005). Human-Computer Interaction.

*Drain, A., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2019). A Collaboration System Model for Planning and Evaluating Participatory Design Projects. 13(3).

*Dubois-Sage, M., Jacquet, B., Jamet, F., & Baratgin, J. (2024). People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020131

*Exss Cid, K. E., Spencer González, H., Vega Córdova, V., Jarpa Azagra, M., Álvarez-Aguado, I., Pastén Bernales, A., & Von Unger Martínez, M. I. (2022). INVESTIGACIÓN INCLUSIVA Y CODISEÑO: COCREACIÓN DE UN SISTEMA DE APOYO TECNOLÓGICO PARA LA DISCAPACIDAD INTELECTUAL. Revista 180, 49. https://doi.org/10.32995/rev180.Num-49.(2022).art-866

*Feng, S., Wang, X., Wang, Q., Fang, J., Wu, Y., Yi, L., & Wei, K. (2018). The uncanny valley effect in typically developing children and its absence in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0206343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206343

*Ferreira, R. D. S., & Castro, T. H. C. D. (2024). Participatory and Inclusive Design Models from the Perspective of Universal Design for Children with Autism: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060613

*Francis, P., Balbo, S., & Firth, L. (2009). Towards co-design with users who have autism spectrum disorders. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0143-y

*Frauenberger, C., Good, J., & Alcorn, A. (2012). Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307171

*Freach, J. (2018, June 22). Behold and Beware, Design Toolkits | School of Design and Creative Technologies—The University of Texas at Austin. https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/behold-and-beware-design-toolkits

*Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L. D., & Yew, V. (2008). How people anthropomorphize robots. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349842

*Gillies-Walker, L., Ramzan, N., Rankin, J., Nimbley, E., & Gillespie-Smith, K. (2023). “You Feel Like You Kind of Walk Between the Two Worlds”: A Participatory Study Exploring How Technology Can Support Emotion Regulation for Autistic People. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(1), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05392-z

*Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas. Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. In PDC 02 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, 144–152.

*Hijab, M. H. F., Banire, B., Neves, J., Qaraqe, M., Othman, A., & Al-Thani, D. (2024). Co-design of Technology Involving Autistic Children: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(22), 7498–7516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2266248

*Hong, J., DaWalt, L. S., Taylor, J. L., Haider, A., & Mailick, M. (2023). Autism through midlife: Trajectories of symptoms, behavioral functioning, and health. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 15(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09505-w

*Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. D. Reidel Pub. Co.

*Jones, C. R., & Bergen, B. K. (2024). People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing test (arXiv:2405.08007). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08007

*Kapp, S. K., Steward, R., Crane, L., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Pellicano, E., & Russell, G. (2019). ‘People should be allowed to do what they like’: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming. Autism, 23(7), 1782–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319829628

*Kintsch, A., & DePaula, R. (2002). A Framework for the Adoption of Assistive Technology.

*Kumazaki, H., Muramatsu, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Corbett, B. A., Matsumoto, Y., Higashida, H., Yuhi, T., Ishiguro, H., Mimura, M., & Kikuchi, M. (2019). Job interview training targeting nonverbal communication using an android robot for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 23(6), 1586–1595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319827134

*Kumazaki, H., Muramatsu, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Matsumoto, Y., Ishiguro, H., Kikuchi, M., Sumiyoshi, T., & Mimura, M. (2020). Optimal robot for intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 74(11), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13132

*Kumazaki, H., Muramatsu, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Matsumoto, Y., Takata, K., Ishiguro, H., & Mimura, M. (2022). Android Robot Promotes Disclosure of Negative Narratives by Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 899664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899664

*Kuriki, S., Tamura, Y., Igarashi, M., Kato, N., & Nakano, T. (2016). Similar impressions of humanness for human and artificial singing voices in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition, 153, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.004

*Madsen, M., El Kaliouby, R., Eckhardt, M., Hoque, M. E., Goodwin, M. S., & Picard, R. (2009). Lessons from participatory design with adolescents on the autism spectrum. CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3835–3840. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520580

*Maun, R., Fabri, M., & Trevorrow, P. (2024). Participatory Methods to Engage Autistic People in the Design of Digital Technology: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54(8), 2960–2971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06015-5

*Mayer, P., Beck, C., & Panek, P. (2012). Examples of multimodal user interfaces for socially assistive robots in Ambient Assisted Living environments. 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6422014

*Merter, S., & Hasırcı, D. (2018). A participatory product design process with children with autism spectrum disorder. CoDesign, 14(3), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2016.1263669

*Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem.’ Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008

*Miserandino, C. (2003). The spoon theory.

*Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative Thematic Inquiry: A New Method for Analyzing Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920955118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118

*Moyà-Köhler, J., Barat-Auleda, O., Vallès-Peris, N., & Domènech, M. (2024). Infrastructuring Neurodiversity Publics: The Co-Design of an App for People with Autism. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1138

*NACIONES UNIDAS. (2008). Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad y Protocolo Facultativo.pdf.

*North Carolina State University, C. of D. (1997). Center for Universal Design. College of Design. https://design.ncsu.edu/research/center-for-universal-design/

*OMS, O. M. de la S. (2001). Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. EMC - Kinesiterapia - Medicina Física, 39(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1293-2965(18)88602-9

*Peters, D., Loke, L., & Ahmadpour, N. (2021). Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign, 17(4), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444

*Rehman, I. U., Sobnath, D., Nasralla, M. M., Winnett, M., Anwar, A., Asif, W., & Sherazi, H. H. R. (2021). Features of Mobile Apps for People with Autism in a Post COVID-19 Scenario: Current Status and Recommendations for Apps Using AI. Diagnostics, 11(10), 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101923

*Reig, S., Carter, E. J., Kirabo, L., Fong, T., Steinfeld, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2021). Smart Home Agents and Devices of Today and Tomorrow: Surveying Use and Desires. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484664

*Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dubowski, J. (2006). Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 479–512. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.16rob

*Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. (2002). Scenario-Based Design. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications (pp. 1032–1050). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

*Sabo, R., Beňuš, Š., Kevická, V., Trnka, M., Rusko, M., Darjaa, S., & Kejriwal, J. (2024). Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities. Human Affairs, 34(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0134

*Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

*Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183

*Schadenberg, B. R., Reidsma, D., Evers, V., Davison, D. P., Li, J. J., Heylen, D. K. J., Neves, C., Alvito, P., Shen, J., Pantić, M., Schuller, B. W., Cummins, N., Olaru, V., Sminchisescu, C., Dimitrijević, S. B., Petrović, S., Baranger, A., Williams, A., Alcorn, A. M., & Pellicano, E. (2021). Predictable Robots for Autistic Children—Variance in Robot Behaviour, Idiosyncrasies in Autistic Children’s Characteristics, and Child–Robot Engagement. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 28(5), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468849

*Schmidt, M. M., Lee, M., Francois, M.-S., Lu, J., Huang, R., Cheng, L., & Weng, Y. (2023). Learning Experience Design of Project PHoENIX: Addressing the Lack of Autistic Representation in Extended Reality Design and Development. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00077-5

*SENADIS. (2020). Guía para la inclusión de las personas con la condición del espectro autista.pdf (1st ed.).

*SENADIS. https://www.senadis.gob.cl/participacion/d/noticias/8422/conoce-la-guia-para-la-inclusion-de-la-persona-con-la-condicion-del-espectro-autista-en-el-contexto-escolar

*SENADIS. (2022). Tercer Estudio Nacional de la Discapacidad III ENDISC 2022.pdf (3). SENADIS.

*SENADIS. (2023). Preguntas y respuestas Ley TEA.pdf.

*Short, E. S., Deng, E. C., Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. J. (2017). Understanding Agency in Interactions Between ChildrenWith Autism and Socially Assistive Robots. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 6(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Short

*Soares, F. O., Costa, S. C., Santos, C. P., Pereira, A. P. S., Hiolle, A. R., & Silva, V. (2019). Socio-emotional development in high functioning children with Autism Spectrum Disorders using a humanoid robot. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 20(2), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15003.cos

*Spencer González, H., Vega Córdova, V., Exss Cid, K., Jarpa Azagra, M., & Álvarez-Aguado, I. (2020). Including intellectual disability in participatory design processes: Methodological adaptations and supports. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385023

*Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical COMMUNCATION, 52(2).

*Stagg, S. D., & Belcher, H. (2019). Living with autism without knowing: Receiving a diagnosis in later life. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 7(1), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2019.1684920

*Tang, Y., Chen, L., Chen, Z., Chen, W., Cai, Y., Du, Y., Yang, F., & Sun, L. (2024). EmoEden: Applying Generative Artificial Intelligence to Emotional Learning for Children with High-Function Autism. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642899

*Torta, E., Oberzaucher, J., Werner, F., Cuijpers, R. H., & Juola, J. F. (2013). Attitudes Towards Socially Assistive Robots in Intelligent Homes: Results From Laboratory Studies and Field Trials. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(2), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Torta

*Ueyama, Y. (2015). A Bayesian Model of the Uncanny Valley Effect for Explaining the Effects of Therapeutic Robots in Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138642

*Valencia, K., Rusu, C., & Botella, F. (2021). User Experience Factors for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10469. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110469

*Valencia, K., Rusu, C., Botella, F., & Jamet, E. (2022). A Methodology to Evaluate User Experience for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Sciences, 12(22), 11340. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211340

*Valencia, K., Rusu, C., Quiñones, D., & Jamet, E. (2019). The Impact of Technology on People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 19(20), 4485. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204485

*Waardenburg, T., Van Huizen, N., Van Dijk, J., Dortmans, K., Magnée, M., Staal, W., Teunisse, J.-P., & Van Der Voort, M. (2022). Design your life: User-initiated design of technology to empower autistic young adults. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 16(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2021-0064

*WHO, W. H. O. (2023, November 15). Autismo. Autism. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders

*WHO, W. H. O. (2025). Assistive technology. https://www.who.int/health-topics/assistive-technology

*Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford university press.

*Zener, D. (2019). Journey to diagnosis for women with autism. Advances in Autism, 5(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-10-2018-0041

*Zhu, R., Hardy, D., & Myers, T. (2018). Building Applications that Matter: Co-designing with Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In S. Siuly, I. Lee, Z. Huang, R. Zhou, H. Wang, & W. Xiang (Eds.), Health Information Science (Vol. 11148, pp. 167–174). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01078-2_15

*Zhu, R., Hardy, D., & Myers, T. (2019). Co-designing with Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: From Ideation to Implementation. Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3370914

*Zhu, R., Hardy, D., & Myers, T. (2022). Community Led Co-Design of a Social Networking Platform with Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04918-9
|-
|}