Diferencia entre revisiones de «Analyzing roles, barriers, and supports of co-researches in an inclusive research»

De Casiopea
Sin resumen de edición
Sin resumen de edición
 
(No se muestran 2 ediciones intermedias de 2 usuarios)
Línea 3: Línea 3:
|Año=2020
|Año=2020
|Autor=Vanessa Vega Córdova, Izaskun Álvarez-Aguado, Herbert Spencer, Cristina Jenaro Río, Mauricio Díaz
|Autor=Vanessa Vega Córdova, Izaskun Álvarez-Aguado, Herbert Spencer, Cristina Jenaro Río, Mauricio Díaz
|Tipo de Publicación=Artículo en Revista Académica (aceptado)
|Tipo de Publicación=Artículo en Revista Académica
|Revista=Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
|Revista=Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
|Indexación=ISI
|Indexación=ISI
|Editorial=Wiley
|Páginas=318-331
|Palabras Clave=adults, intellectual disabilities, inclusive research, self-perceptions
|Palabras Clave=adults, intellectual disabilities, inclusive research, self-perceptions
|Carreras Relacionadas=Diseño, Diseño Gráfico, Otra
|Área de Investigación=Forma, Cultura y Tecnología
|Código=https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12354
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jppi.12354
|Carreras Relacionadas=Diseño, Otra, Interacción y Servicios
|Nota=Full access
}}
}}
Current research demands we rethink the roles of people with intellectual disabilities in the research that affects them. The paradigm of inclusive research responds to this need. Although specialized literature is progressively adopting a more inclusive research approach, the study of roles and relationships within inclusive research and reflections on theprocess of doing participatory research has received little attention. Specific aims: From a qualitative approach and a participatory action research framework this study aims to: (1) report the experience of involving adults with intellectual disabilities in an inclusive research, and their improvements in terms of developed competencies; (2) identify their perceived roles as researchers, and (3) describe their perceived barriers and facilitators during the research process. Method: This study describes the experiences of 11 adults with intellectual disabilities who participated in a project aimed at evaluating the cognitive accessibility of public spaces and services in a Chilean city for 14 months. Findings: Different roles emerged, ranging from apprentices to experts by experience, and were adopted to different extents by
Current research demands we rethink the roles of people with intellectual disabilities in the research that affects them. The paradigm of inclusive research responds to this need. Although specialized literature is progressively adopting a more inclusive research approach, the study of roles and relationships within inclusive research and reflections on theprocess of doing participatory research has received little attention. Specific aims: From a qualitative approach and a participatory action research framework this study aims to: (1) report the experience of involving adults with intellectual disabilities in an inclusive research, and their improvements in terms of developed competencies; (2) identify their perceived roles as researchers, and (3) describe their perceived barriers and facilitators during the research process. Method: This study describes the experiences of 11 adults with intellectual disabilities who participated in a project aimed at evaluating the cognitive accessibility of public spaces and services in a Chilean city for 14 months. Findings: Different roles emerged, ranging from apprentices to experts by experience, and were adopted to different extents by
co-researchers as the process evolved. Co-researchers developed conceptual, procedural, and attitudinal skills. They also identified contextual and personal barriers as well as facilitators consisting of natural, professional, and community supports, in addition to assisted technology while performing their role as co-researchers. Discussion: Inclusive research is a challenging evolving process and it requires ongoing support and feedback to monitor the process and the outcomes to guarantee that all the participants perform the different roles involved while meeting the goals of the research.
co-researchers as the process evolved. Co-researchers developed conceptual, procedural, and attitudinal skills. They also identified contextual and personal barriers as well as facilitators consisting of natural, professional, and community supports, in addition to assisted technology while performing their role as co-researchers. Discussion: Inclusive research is a challenging evolving process and it requires ongoing support and feedback to monitor the process and the outcomes to guarantee that all the participants perform the different roles involved while meeting the goals of the research.

Revisión actual - 10:36 16 dic 2020




TítuloAnalyzing roles, barriers and supports of co-researches in an inclusive research
Año2020
AutorVanessa Vega Córdova, Izaskun Álvarez-Aguado, Herbert Spencer, Cristina Jenaro Río, Mauricio Díaz
Tipo de PublicaciónArtículo en Revista Académica
RevistaJournal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
IndexaciónISI
EditorialWiley
Páginas318-331
Palabras Claveadults, intellectual disabilities, inclusive research, self-perceptions
Área de InvestigaciónForma, Cultura y Tecnología
Código
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12354
URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jppi.12354
Carreras RelacionadasDiseño, Otra, Interacción y Servicios"Interacción y Servicios" is not in the list (Arquitectura, Diseño, Magíster, Otra) of allowed values for the "Carreras Relacionadas" property.
NotaFull access

Current research demands we rethink the roles of people with intellectual disabilities in the research that affects them. The paradigm of inclusive research responds to this need. Although specialized literature is progressively adopting a more inclusive research approach, the study of roles and relationships within inclusive research and reflections on theprocess of doing participatory research has received little attention. Specific aims: From a qualitative approach and a participatory action research framework this study aims to: (1) report the experience of involving adults with intellectual disabilities in an inclusive research, and their improvements in terms of developed competencies; (2) identify their perceived roles as researchers, and (3) describe their perceived barriers and facilitators during the research process. Method: This study describes the experiences of 11 adults with intellectual disabilities who participated in a project aimed at evaluating the cognitive accessibility of public spaces and services in a Chilean city for 14 months. Findings: Different roles emerged, ranging from apprentices to experts by experience, and were adopted to different extents by co-researchers as the process evolved. Co-researchers developed conceptual, procedural, and attitudinal skills. They also identified contextual and personal barriers as well as facilitators consisting of natural, professional, and community supports, in addition to assisted technology while performing their role as co-researchers. Discussion: Inclusive research is a challenging evolving process and it requires ongoing support and feedback to monitor the process and the outcomes to guarantee that all the participants perform the different roles involved while meeting the goals of the research.